Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century – Article Example

The paper "Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-first Century" is a wonderful example of an article review on social science.
“Place Matters: Metropolitics for Twenty-First Century” focuses on the varied differences and acute segregations between the rich class and the poor, residing in the metropolis and the suburbs of the US, which determines the nature of democracy in the country and the fate of the political parties. A thorough reading of the text, “Place Matters: Metropolitics for Twenty-First Century”, exhibits its excessive focus on the metropolis and their economic activities in overt ways. This has gradually extended the boundaries of a metropolis and overburdened the areas, which are the centres of economic activities, thereby depriving and disconnecting the poor families and poor neighbourhoods from getting the fruit of the emerging global economy, making it quixotic for them to become a part of the national economic growth and prosperity. The main reason for the focus of any government on the metros and suburbs of the US lies in the fact that these areas are highly concentrated and has attracted immigrants over the decades for generating employment and other economic activities. In addition, the immigrants of America have gradually become the part of the democracy, thereby exercising political will and participating in the general elections over the years. Apparently, all these activities have accelerated urbanization in the US (Dreier, Mollenkopf and Swanstrom 2004).
The confrontation of the problem between the huge differences in economic growth of the metropolis, the suburbs and the inner cities can be tackled by an equitable distribution of work, equal focus of the government upon the suburbs, the metropolis and the out-backs. This will certainly help in generating economic growth opportunities for all the centres. For instance, opening more manufacturing units in the suburbs, which would allow the less literate labour and populace of the suburbs participate into economic activity without moving to big cities will be a major help to fortify the living standards of these populaces in the US (Dreier, Mollenkopf and Swanstrom 2004).
Question 2
The national elections should facilitate an environment, which would be conducive to national growth and prosperity. In this vision, the major issue, which the metropolis of the US should uphold, is to find out the ways for mitigating the overpressure of population on the urban centres of the US, which is not only polluting the living ambiance of the cities , but is also putting excess pressure on the limited resources of the urban centres. In addition, the urban blocks of the US are facing unemployment, precisely, for the reason of immigration and exceed expectations of the neighbouring poor cities and older suburbs upon the emerging metropolis (Dreier, Mollenkopf and Swanstrom 2004).